From f0ce860ffd60561d320b4729eca512ef2a2e02d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Dessaux
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 23:29:18 +0100
Subject: Added wireguard routing part two blog article

---
 content/blog/miscellaneous/wireguard-routing.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'content/blog/miscellaneous/wireguard-routing.md')

diff --git a/content/blog/miscellaneous/wireguard-routing.md b/content/blog/miscellaneous/wireguard-routing.md
index 46343b7..446555d 100644
--- a/content/blog/miscellaneous/wireguard-routing.md
+++ b/content/blog/miscellaneous/wireguard-routing.md
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ A key takeaway is this: Even though with other vpn solutions (or traditional net
 
 ## Routing tables
 
-With this setup if Dalinar was a Linux, its routing table would looks like this with `ip -4 r`:
+With this setup if Dalinar was a Linux, its routing table would look like this with `ip -4 r`:
 ```
 10.1.2.2 dev wg0 scope link
 192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.10 metric 600
-- 
cgit v1.2.3