diff options
author | Julien Dessaux | 2023-12-05 00:04:45 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Julien Dessaux | 2023-12-05 00:04:45 +0100 |
commit | cc64994aa6a96835a7ccc379bf612cc172507d97 (patch) | |
tree | 8c365daa0002dee05fc87978c11de0ddab16b1f1 /content/blog/haskell | |
parent | typo and makefile error (diff) | |
download | www-cc64994aa6a96835a7ccc379bf612cc172507d97.tar.gz www-cc64994aa6a96835a7ccc379bf612cc172507d97.tar.bz2 www-cc64994aa6a96835a7ccc379bf612cc172507d97.zip |
Added finishing advent of code 2022 in haskell blog article
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | content/blog/haskell/finishing-advent-of-code-2022-in-haskell.md | 122 |
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/blog/haskell/finishing-advent-of-code-2022-in-haskell.md b/content/blog/haskell/finishing-advent-of-code-2022-in-haskell.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c12c743 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/blog/haskell/finishing-advent-of-code-2022-in-haskell.md @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +--- +title: Finishing advent of code 2022 in Haskell +description: Last year I stopped on day 22, I finally took it up again +date: 2023-12-05 +tags: +- haskell +--- + +## Introduction + +I wrote about doing the [advent of code 2022 in zig]({{< ref "advent-of-code-2022-in-zig.md" >}}), but I did not complete the year. I stopped on using zig on day 15 when I hit a bug when using hashmaps that I could not solve in time and continued in JavaScript until [day 2022](https://adventofcode.com/2022/day/22). On day 22 part 2, you need to fold a cube and move on it keeping track of your orientation... It was hard! + +Last week I wanted to warm up for the current advent of code and therefore took it up again... it was (almost) easy with Haskell! + +## Day 22 - Monkey Map + +You get an input that looks like this: +``` + ...# + .#.. + #... + .... +...#.......# +........#... +..#....#.... +..........#. + ...#.... + .....#.. + .#...... + ......#. + +10R5L5R10L4R5L5 +``` + +The `.` are floor tiles, the `#` are impassable walls. You have a cursor starting on the leftmost tile on the first line. The cursor moves and the empty spaces do not exist: if you step out you wrap around: easy enough... until part 2! + +Here is how I parse the input: +```haskell +type Line = V.Vector Char +type Map = V.Vector Line +data Instruction = Move Int | L | R deriving Show +data Input = Input Map [Instruction] deriving Show +type Parser = Parsec Void String + +parseMapLine :: Parser Line +parseMapLine = do + line <- some (char '.' <|> char ' ' <|> char '#') <* eol + return $ V.generate (length line) (line !!) + +parseMap :: Parser Map +parseMap = do + lines <- some parseMapLine <* eol + return $ V.generate (length lines) (lines !!) + +parseInstruction :: Parser Instruction +parseInstruction = (Move . read <$> some digitChar) + <|> (char 'L' $> L) + <|> (char 'R' $> R) + +parseInput' :: Parser Input +parseInput' = Input <$> parseMap + <*> some parseInstruction <* eol <* eof +``` + +In part 2 you learn that your input pattern is in fact 6 squares that can be folded to form a cube. Now instead of simply wrapping the empty spaces, when stepping out you need to find out were you end up on the cube and with which orientation. + +Here is a visualization I made in excalidraw to understand how folding the cube based on my input would work (this does not match the example above but matched the players' input): + +![excalidraw cube folding](https://files.adyxax.org/www/aoc-2022-22-folding.excalidraw.svg) + +The whole code is available [on my git server](https://git.adyxax.org/adyxax/advent-of-code/tree/2022/22-Monkey-Map/second.hs) but here is the core of my solver for this puzzle: +```haskell +stepOutside :: Map -> Int -> Int -> Int -> Heading -> Int -> Cursor +stepOutside m s x y h i | (t, h) == (a, N) = proceed fw (fn + rx) E + | (t, h) == (a, W) = proceed dw (ds - ry) E + | (t, h) == (b, N) = proceed (fw + rx) fs N + | (t, h) == (b, E) = proceed ee (es - ry) W + | (t, h) == (b, S) = proceed ce (cn + rx) W + | (t, h) == (c, W) = proceed (dw + ry) dn S + | (t, h) == (c, E) = proceed (bw + ry) bs N + | (t, h) == (d, N) = proceed cw (cn + rx) E + | (t, h) == (d, W) = proceed aw (as - ry) E + | (t, h) == (e, E) = proceed be (bs - ry) W + | (t, h) == (e, S) = proceed fe (fn + rx) W + | (t, h) == (f, W) = proceed (aw + ry) an S + | (t, h) == (f, S) = proceed (bw + rx) bn S + | (t, h) == (f, E) = proceed (ew + ry) es N + where + (tx, rx) = x `divMod` s + (ty, ry) = y `divMod` s + t = (tx, ty) + proceed :: Int -> Int -> Heading -> Cursor + proceed x' y' h' = case m V.! y' V.! x' of + '.' -> step m s (Cursor x' y' h') (Move $ i - 1) + '#' -> Cursor x y h + (ax, ay) = (1, 0) + (bx, by) = (2, 0) + (cx, cy) = (1, 1) + (dx, dy) = (0, 2) + (ex, ey) = (1, 2) + (fx, fy) = (0, 3) + a = (ax, ay) + b = (bx, by) + c = (cx, cy) + d = (dx, dy) + e = (ex, ey) + f = (fx, fy) + (an, as, aw, ae) = (ay * s, (ay+1)*s-1, ax *s, (ax+1)*s-1) + (bn, bs, bw, be) = (by * s, (by+1)*s-1, bx *s, (bx+1)*s-1) + (cn, cs, cw, ce) = (cy * s, (cy+1)*s-1, cx *s, (cx+1)*s-1) + (dn, ds, dw, de) = (dy * s, (dy+1)*s-1, dx *s, (dx+1)*s-1) + (en, es, ew, ee) = (ey * s, (ey+1)*s-1, ex *s, (ex+1)*s-1) + (fn, fs, fw, fe) = (fy * s, (fy+1)*s-1, fx *s, (fx+1)*s-1) +``` + +This `stepOutside` function takes in argument the map, its size, the cursor's `(x, y)` position and heading `h`, while i is the number of steps to perform. I first compute on which face the cursor is, and based on its heading where it should end up. I then use the faces coordinates to compute the final position, being careful to follow on the schematic how the transition is performed. + +## Conclusion + +The next days where quite a lot easier than this one. Haskell is really a great language for puzzle solving thanks to its excellent parsing capabilities and its incredible type system. + +A great thing that should speak of Haskell's qualities is that it is the second year of advent of code that I completed all 25 days: both times it was thanks to Haskell! I think I should revisit the years 2021 that I did with Go next: I stopped on day 19 because it involved a three dimensional puzzle that was quite difficult. |